Social penetration theory

Assumptions[ edit ] Social penetration theory is based on four basic assumptions. For instance, on a first date, people tend to present their outer images only, talking about hobbies. As the relational development progresses, wider and more controversial topics such as political views are included in the conversations. Second, interpersonal relationships develop in a generally systematic and predictable manner. This assumption indicates the predictability of relationship development. Although it is impossible to foresee the exact and precise path of relational development, there is certain trajectory to follow. As Altman and Taylor note, “People seem to possess very sensitive tuning mechanisms which enable them to program carefully their interpersonal relationships. For example, after prolonged and fierce fights, a couple who originally planned to get married may decide to break up and turn to be strangers ultimately. Fourth, self-disclosure is the key to facilitate relationship development.

Managing Groups and Teams/Print version

University of Texas at Austin Abstract Scholars have recently begun to harness the immense power of speed-dating procedures to achieve important and novel insights into the dynamics of romantic attraction. Speed-dating procedures allow researchers to study romantic dynamics dyadically, with regard to potentially meaningful relationships, and with strong external validity. This article highlights the strengths and promise of speed-dating procedures, reviews some of their most exciting contributions to our understanding of the social psyche, and illustrates how scholars can employ speed-dating and its straightforward variants to study topics relevant to diverse subfields of psychological science.

Do you want to read the rest of this article? We addressed our three aims using a heterosexual speeddating event, whereby participants had a series of brief oneon-one dates with other attendees fellow participants in search of a potential romantic partner.

Scholars have recently begun to harness the immense power of speed-dating procedures to achieve important and novel insights into the dynamics of romantic attraction.

Learning Objectives This is a beginning to intermediate level course. After completing this course, mental health professionals will be able to: Outline the history of ADHD as a mental disorder. Describe the core symptoms of ADHD. Discuss associated impairments and comorbid psychiatric disorders. Explain the typical developmental course and demographic distribution of ADHD. Discuss the various etiologies that contribute to the development of ADHD.

Apply a theoretical model of executive function and self-regulation to the clinical management of ADHD. The materials in this course are based on the most accurate information available to the author at the time of writing. The field of ADHD grows daily, and new information may emerge that supersedes these course materials. This course will equip clinicians to have a basic understanding of the nature of ADHD, the history of the disorder, its causes, and its associated disorders and impairments.

Introduction This course provides an overview of the nature of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, briefly considers its history, describes its developmental course and outcomes, and discusses its causes. Current critical issues related to these matters will be raised along the way. Given the thousands of scientific papers on this topic, this course must, of necessity, concentrate on the most important topics in this literature.

Social penetration theory

Assumptions[ edit ] Social penetration theory is based on four basic assumptions. For instance, on a first date, people tend to present their outer images only, talking about hobbies. As the relational development progresses, wider and more controversial topics such as political views are included in the conversations. Second, interpersonal relationships develop in a generally systematic and predictable manner.

speed-dating to (a) study dyadic processes, (b) examine real relationshipsinreal time,and (c) enjoy strong external validity. Dyadic Processes One advantage of speed-dating is that its procedures allow.

The evolutionary success of our species is indeed due, to a large degree, to our unparalleled other-regarding abilities. Yet, a comprehensive understanding of human cooperation remains a formidable challenge. Recent research in the social sciences indicates that it is important to focus on the collective behavior that emerges as the result of the interactions among individuals, groups, and even societies.

Non-equilibrium statistical physics, in particular Monte Carlo methods and the theory of collective behavior of interacting particles near phase transition points, has proven to be very valuable for understanding counterintuitive evolutionary outcomes. By treating models of human cooperation as classical spin models, a physicist can draw on familiar settings from statistical physics. However, unlike pairwise interactions among particles that typically govern solid-state physics systems, interactions among humans often involve group interactions, and they also involve a larger number of possible states even for the most simplified description of reality.

Speed-Dating

Using the Social Relations Model , there are two forms of reciprocity: Generalized reciprocity implies a correlation between perceiver and target effects. So if A sees others as friendly, is A seen as friendly? Dyadic reciprocity implies a correlation between relationship effects. So if A sees B as especially friendly, does B see A as especially friendly?

Social penetration is known for its onion analogy, which implies that self-disclosure is the process of tearing layers or concentric circles away. The onion denotes various layers of personality. It is sometimes called the “onion theory” of ality is like a multi-layered onion with public self on the outer layer and private self at the core.

It is generally accepted that group cohesion and performance are associated. Generally, there tend to be more studies supporting a positive relationship between group cohesion and performance. The Question What is team cohesiveness and why does it matter to an organization to have cohesiveness within its teams? Team Composition How to promote team cohesion when selecting and identifying diversity within teams In their journal article Beyond Relational Demography: Price, and Myrtle P. Bell discuss the composition of teams and its effect on cohesiveness.

They describe two different categories of diversity, namely surface level and deeper level. In general, the findings have been fairly inconsistent within and across studies as to how diversity in these areas affect team cohesion. There has been less research done in this area with regards to teams in workplace settings, though a number of social psychological studies have been conducted.

Overall cohesiveness was strengthened in such cases. Hence, for optimum results, teams ought to include deep-level diversity as part of the process for achieving cohesiveness.

Managing Groups and Teams/Print version

Parasocial Relationships Exam Paper Advice In the exam, you will be asked a range of questions on the topic of relationships, which may include questions about research methods or using mathematical skills based on research into relationships. There is no guarantee that a mark question will be asked in this topic though so it is important to have a good understanding of all of the different areas linked to the topic.

There will be 24 marks for relationship questions, so you can expect to spend about 30 minutes on this section, but this is not a strict rule. The evolutionary explanations for partner preferences The relationship between sexual selection and human reproductive behavior Anisogamy AO1 Anisogamy means two sex cells or gametes that are different coming together to reproduce.

The chance for mating with a speed-dating partner was 6%, and was increased by men’s short-term mating interest; the chance for relating was 4%, and was .

.

Social penetration theory

.

Scientific Power of Speed-Dating Limitations of Speed-Dating Dyadic Processes: romantic attraction from both parties dyadic reciprocity- uniquely with each other generalized reciprocity- tendency for those who desire others to be desired in return positive dyadic reciprocity.

.

Managing Groups and Teams/Print version

.

Speed Dating: What Predicts Success? Authentic dates involve behaviours and expectations that are unlikely existent in a 5 minute speed date context Dyadic reciprocity was not significant during the date, but was at the post-event.

.

.

components: Dyadic reciprocity, which refers to liking that is shared uniquely between two individuals, and generalized reciprocity, which refers to the tendency for .

.

.

Nationally Accredited Continuing Education Courses for Psychologists, Social Workers, Counselors, and Marriage and Family Therapists.

.

Speed Dating Gone Wrong (Hilarious Video)